Bubble Trouble
A crack in the 'bubble
wall'?
In our July-25 commentary at www.speculative-investor.com
we described a number of early warning signs that the giant US credit bubble
had entered its terminal stage. Amongst these 'things to lookout for' was
a breakdown in the stock prices of the Government Sponsored Enterprises
(GSEs).
The GSEs have played an important role
in perpetuating the credit bubble by making a virtually unlimited supply
of credit available for the purchase of homes and the re-financing of existing
mortgages. After all, the GSEs are not hamstrung, as the banks are, by
the need to maintain a certain level of reserves relative to their liabilities.
The ready availability of credit for anyone wishing to take out a mortgage
or re-finance a mortgage has helped push property prices higher even as
economic growth has ground to a halt. Higher property prices and the ability
of home-owners to monetise the equity in their homes have, in turn, boosted
consumer spending and led to a build-up of money in money-market funds.
The money that is currently sitting in money-market funds earning 3% per
year will, of course, eventually find its way into the economy, thus pushing
other prices higher.
The largest of the GSEs is Federal
National Mortgage (NYSE: FNM), affectionately known as Fannie Mae. The
Fannie Mae stock price surged during the final 5 months of last year in
anticipation of the coming Fed rate reductions and the mortgage re-financing
boom, peaked immediately prior to the first Fed rate cut, and has been
in a flat consolidation for most of this year (see chart below). It is
now starting to break down, having just fallen below its medium-term up-trend
and its 200-day moving-average.
Friday's break below the 200-day moving-average
is perhaps even more significant because it happened on strong volume and
on a day during which the Dow gained 200 points. Major support is around
$72 - a break below $72 would be a signal that the credit bubble is on
its deathbed.
The other early warning signs that
the Bubble was in trouble were identified as being:
a) A substantial and prolonged fall
in the US$. For an extended period leading up to the bursting of previous
major credit bubbles (eg, Japan in 1990 and the US in 1987), the currency
of the bubble economy has trended lower. As such, we expect the final phase
of the current US credit bubble to be characterised by a downward-trending
Dollar. The Dollar began its decline in either October of last year or
July of this year depending on whether we use, as the starting point, the
peak in the Dollar's value relative to the euro and the SF or the peak
in the Dollar Index. Either way, the downtrend has a long way to go.
b) Major rallies in gold and gold
stocks. So far we have only seen a few hints of what is to come in the
gold market.
c) A large fall in bond prices. Bonds
are still in the process of topping, but we expect much lower bond prices
(much higher long-term interest rates) once the effects of the massive
inflation of the past 10 months work their way through the US economy.
The ducks remain in line
In our recent article "Manipulation
Versus Natural Market Forces" we made the argument that market forces were
gradually getting the upper hand over the on-going attempts of governments
and bullion banks to manipulate the gold price lower. In the article we
described what we consider to be the three most important natural
influences on the gold price - the US Dollar's exchange rate versus the
European currencies, the yield spread, and the inflation-adjusted (real)
interest rate. The trend in each of these influencing factors turned positive
for gold during the final quarter of last year and remains so to this day.
Note that we did not include changes
in the supply of newly-mined gold or the fabrication demand for gold as
important influences on the gold price. This is because the gold price
is primarily determined by investment demand (investment demand is the
main driver of the gold price whereas fabrication demand is driven
by the gold price). The investment demand for gold is, in turn, determined
by such things as the level of confidence in the Dollar, perceptions regarding
inflation and the real rate of return on US$-denominated securities.
From time to time over the past several
years different factors have come into play to make a gold rally appear
likely. However, the last time that all the important ducks were
lined up the way they have been since November of last year was during
the first half of 1993. For those with short memories, the first half of
1993 was a very good time to be invested in gold stocks.
Other ingredients, such as dangerously-high
leverage within the financial system and a massive short position in physical
gold, have been added to today's gold market mix. These other ingredients
are usually portrayed as being positives for the gold price, which is partly
true since they could potentially result in an explosive rally of $100
or more. However, because the total short position is too large to be covered
without causing an enormous rally and, therefore, without causing the players
involved serious financial damage, there is a powerful incentive to step-up
the selling pressure whenever the gold price begins to edge higher. This
effectively eliminates the possibility of a prolonged steady rise in the
gold price. Instead, if the underlying trends in the financial markets
remain positive for gold then the pressure will just continue to build
until there is a price explosion.
As long as the financial market trends
remain positive for gold we will continue to emphasise gold-related investments,
particularly when price-action is also constructive as it has been for
gold stocks since November of last year and for gold since April of this
year.
Regular financial market forecasts
and
analyses are provided at our web site:
http://www.speculative-investor.com/new/index.html
One-month free trial available.
|