Options
Risk Management (Commentary by Adam Hamilton, http://www.zealllc.com/)
The Usual Options Caveats
Before we dig in, I have to strongly
reiterate that options trading is not for everyone. Speculation itself
is defined by Webster's massive dictionary as "engagement in business transactions
involving considerable risk but offering the chance of large gains, esp.
trading in commodities, stocks, etc., in the hope of profit from changes
in the market price." Speculators and non-speculators alike can never
forget this definition. Most folks immediately zero in on the seductive
"large gains" portion while ignoring the double-edged-sword nature of speculation.
In order to have the "chance of large gains" a speculator also has to totally
and completely accept the "considerable risk" involved. Just as in
any human endeavor, the biggest rewards are only possible for those willing
to take the biggest risks. There is no such thing as speculation
without a very real and immediate risk of loss!
The Muddled American Cultural View
of Risk
There is no special valor in speculating
and no shame in not speculating. Some of us are hardwired to be tolerant
of big risks and some are not. Our modern American culture sends
mixed messages about risk, confusing the issues for many. For example,
Americans tend to greatly over-insure themselves against every conceivable
low-probability risk. Americans also seem to want a Big Brother government
to protect and insure them against all of life's countless uncertainties.
All these common traits are signs of very low risk tolerance. Yet,
at the same time, most Americans willingly choose to become big leveraged
speculators, making giant macro bets about future market prices at staggering
levels running a half-dozen times their annual incomes or more! A
house mortgage, a debt-leveraged speculation often undertaken at 5x to
20x margin, is phenomenally risky. This magnitude of debt leverage
makes options trading look like playschool, yet paradoxically most Americans
view options speculation as hyper-risky but macro real-estate speculation
as perfectly safe! These kinds of striking inconsistencies in cultural
risk tolerance tend to obscure risk issues.
Regardless of whether you choose to
be a speculator or not, in any conceivable market, understanding and managing
risks is a very valuable skill to acquire. Since my consulting clients
were inquiring about risk management from the perspective of index-options
trading, this letter assumes that focus. But these same principles
can be applied in all other kinds of speculations too, so even if you are
not an index-options trader this is important knowledge to seek.
Strategic Passive Portfolio Risk
Management
Interestingly the ultimate risk-management
strategies for speculators are activated well before a single dollar is
deployed. I use these techniques extensively in my own personal portfolio
and have discussed them a few times in the past. Before a speculator
even speculates, he or she must make some crucial decisions on portfolio
allocation. Out of your entire capital portfolio, what percentage
of your assets are you willing to risk on speculations? This number
varies considerably. Some people crave risk and are blessed to sleep
like babies even with big bets on the line. Other folks are not willing
to sacrifice even a sliver of their hard-earned capital to the capricious
vagaries of market fate. Now once again it is important to realize
that there is no honor and no shame in leaning towards a more aggressive
or more conservative stance as a speculator! Risk tolerance, like
most of the building blocks of our individual personalities, is one of
the wonderful elements that renders each of us unique.
Both aggressive and conservative speculators
can certainly achieve dazzling success. George Soros and Warren Buffett
both became billionaires by trading, but one was an aggressive gunslinger
and the other a far-more conservative long-term value player. In
your own case, carefully consider your entire portfolio and pick a number.
Perhaps you are willing to risk a maximum of 3% of your assets in risky
speculations. Maybe you are willing to risk 30%. Either way,
you absolutely have to define up front before you engage in actual speculations
exactly what your maximum acceptable exposure will be. After carefully
deciding your overall portfolio division between relatively low-risk investments
and high-risk speculations, maintain iron discipline to keep these pools
of capital separate. If 10% is your magic risk-tolerance number,
make sure, no matter what, that at no time do you ever bet more than 10%
of your entire fortune on all your risky speculations put together.
While this sounds quite basic, I can't tell you how many folks I have seen
get in trouble because they over-speculated! Just like you would
set aside a fixed amount of cash to gamble before you visited Vegas, you
have to know in advance how much total portfolio speculation risk you are
willing to bear. This is the first step of passive portfolio risk
management.
The Second Passive Risk Step
After deciding on your maximum strategic
portfolio allocation to speculations, you can engage in the crucial second
step of passive portfolio risk management prior to launching any speculative
trade. This key discipline applies regardless of what type of speculation
you are considering from index options to untested junior gold stocks to
penny tech stocks. Before pulling the trigger on any speculation,
search your heart and decide exactly how much capital you are willing to
completely lose if your bet turns sour.
Yes you read that right! Speculation
is risky, so prior to even deploying capital make darned sure you can live
happily ever after if a trade doesn't play out the way you hoped.
If you are considering betting $5000 on an index-options play, for example,
you have to know in advance that you can kiss that capital goodbye in the
worst-case scenario and go on with your life without any emotional baggage.
This crucial discipline ensures two things. First, it makes you carefully
consider the size of all your trades. All speculators know how easy
it is to get all caught up in the moment when a particularly promising
trade comes along! Rather than being blinded by visions of dazzling
profits seductively dancing through your mind, instead think of the worst-case-scenario
100% loss to ensure that it is acceptable to you if that particular trade
doesn't pan out. Limit all of your trades to a size where a total
loss won't seriously injure you, either financially or psychologically.
Second, thinking in terms of the worst-case
scenario in all trades prior to deployment helps you keep your overall
speculative portfolio balanced. In addition to carving up your entire
portfolio into totally separate portions dedicated to investment and speculation
as we discussed earlier, you also need to make capital-allocation decisions
within the speculative portions. This can be quite challenging, since
there are always competing speculation opportunities today and tomorrow
that you must decide between. Entering each new trade aware of a
potential 100% loss helps keep speculators from over-allocating to a single
trade. For example, if your maximum exposure to speculation is 10%
of all your financial assets, perhaps your maximum individual-trade exposure
will be 10% of speculations, which is 1% of your entire capital base.
Understanding that each potential risky speculation could very well prove
to be a total loss helps ensure that you don't over-allocate into any single
trade and risk wiping out your entire pool of speculative capital on one
tragic massive bet.
All-Or-Nothing Speculating
Personally, this is how I have long-managed
all my own speculation risk. Rather than actively managing trades
already in progress, I am meticulous and ruthless in ensuring that I never
risk too much on any single trade. All of this passive portfolio
risk management is done before a dollar is even thrown at the markets.
I seek out an opportunity, I decide what amount of capital I am willing
to completely lose if the markets conspire against me, and only then will
I pull the trigger and make the bet. If I am blessed with a win on
a particular trade I praise God and rejoice, but if I suffer a loss I am
able to shrug and move on because I never risked enough capital in any
one trade to really damage my portfolio in a worst-case-scenario total
loss.
Now I still won't hesitate to close
in-progress trades, at either losses or wins, if I perceive that the underlying
conditions that led me to originally make any given trade are no longer
in force. For example, on QQQ index puts, which are ultimately a
valuation and sentiment play, I would sell them instantly if the earnings
of the mega-tech companies miraculously tripled, eliminating the valuation
play. I would also dump them immediately if widespread fear hijacked
popular market sentiment. But as long as the original market conditions
that led to any risky speculation still remain, I'm quite content to leave
the speculations alive.
I really like this all-or-nothing approach
because I have found that it dramatically reduces overall speculation stress
for me. I find and study a potential speculation opportunity, decide
how much I am willing to risk, make the bet, and then I live with the consequences
win, lose, or draw. At all times I know exactly how much of my scarce
capital I am risking. I also always know that I can fully absorb
all speculation losses without financially or psychologically damaging
my ability and means stay in the great game.
|